It's Something All of Us in the West Have in Common.
Published on May 15, 2010 By Infidel In Religion

Albert Einstein once said, "The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results".

Epperson v. Arkansas, 393 U.S. 97 (1968), was a United States Supreme Court case that invalidated an Arkansas statute that prohibited the teaching of human evolution in the public schools. The Court held that the First Amendment to the United States Constitution prohibits a state from requiring, in the words of the majority opinion, "that teaching and learning must be tailored to the principles or prohibitions of any religious sect or dogma." The Supreme Court declared the Arkansas statute unconstitutional because it violated the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epperson_v._Arkansas

Daniel v. Waters was a 1975 legal case in which the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit struck down Tennessee's law regarding the teaching of "equal time" of evolution and creationism in public school science classes because it violated the Establishment clause of the US Constitution. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_v._Waters

Hendren et al. v. Campbell et al. was a 1977 ruling by an Indiana state superior court that the young-earth creationist textbook Biology: A Search For Order In Complexity, published by the Creation Research Society and promoted through the Institute for Creation Research, could not be used in Indiana public schools. The ruling declared: "The question is whether a text obviously designed to present only the view of Biblical Creationism in a favorable light is constitutionally acceptable in the public schools of Indiana. Two hundred years of constitutional government demand that the answer be no." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hendren_v._Campbell

McLean v. Arkansas Board of Education, 529 F. Supp. 1255, 1258-1264 (ED Ark. 1982), was a 1981 legal case in Arkansas which ruled that the Arkansas "Balanced Treatment for Creation-Science and Evolution-Science Act" (Act 590) was unconstitutional because it violated the establishment clause of the U.S. Constitution. The judge, William Overton, handed down his decision on January 5, 1982, giving a clear, specific definition of science as a basis for ruling that “creation science” is religion and is simply not science. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McLean_v._Arkansas

Edwards v. Aguillard, 482 U.S. 578 (1987) was a case heard by the Supreme Court of the United States in 1987 regarding creationism. The Court ruled that a Louisiana law requiring that creation science be taught in public schools along with evolution was unconstitutional, because the law was specifically intended to advance a particular religion. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edwards_v._Aguillard

Tammy Kitzmiller, et al. v. Dover Area School District, et al. (400 F. Supp. 2d 707, Docket no. 4cv2688) was the first direct challenge brought in the United States federal courts against a public school district that required the presentation of intelligent design as an alternative to evolution as an "explanation of the origin of life."The plaintiffs successfully argued that intelligent design is a form of creationism, and that the school board policy thus violated the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kitzmiller_v._Dover_Area_School_District


Comments (Page 12)
14 PagesFirst 10 11 12 13 14 
on May 31, 2010

Yes, but which book is that sacred scripture? We don't know which book G-d wrote.

There's only one that has stood the test of time.  A Professor M. Montiero Williams, former Boden professor of Sanskrit, spent 42 years studying Eastern books and in comparing them with the Bible said this:

"Pile them, if you will, on the left side of your study table; but place your own Holy Bible on the right side-all by itself, all alone-and with a wide gap between them.  For...there is a gulf between it and the so-called sacred books of the East, which severs the one from the other utterly hoplessly and forever...a veritable gulf which canot be bridged over by any science or religious thought."

It's unique in its continuity, its circulation, it's translation, its survival, its teaching, it's influence on surrounding literature, etc.  If you are an intelligent person, you will read the one book that has drawn more attention than any other, if you are searching for the truth. 

While this does not prove the Bible is the Word of God it does prove it stands alone among books in it's survival through criticism, its survival through persecution, and through time etc.  If the book had not been the book of God, men woud have destroyed it long ago.  Emperors and popes, kings and priests, princes and rulers have all tried ther hand at it.  They are all dead and the book still lives. 

Incidentally, the design of modern cars did descend from the design of the first car. Each designer looked at the designs of previous designers.

I believe as God states in the bible that nature and creation itself reveals that there is a Creator.  We know that for every design there is a designer, and for every law there is a lawgiver.  "in the beginning God created" is still the most up to date statement on the origin of the universe and all that it contains. 

 

on May 31, 2010

We know that for every design there is a designer, and for every law there is a lawgiver. "in the beginning God created" is still the most up to date statement on the origin of the universe and all that it contains.

Quite scientific, too.

on May 31, 2010

If the Bible is so holy and sacred, why isn't it free? Shouldn't all items which are truly holy, sacred and imbued with some kind of supernatural power be separate from capitalism?

on May 31, 2010

If the Bible is so holy and sacred, why isn't it free?

It is.

You can find the text online and there really is no lack of Christian missionaries trying to give you free Bibles. I myself got a Christian Bible in Hebrew (!) on the train to Haifa last year.

 

on May 31, 2010

You can find the text online and there really is no lack of Christian missionaries trying to give you free Bibles.

Ok, but stores still sell them and other religious items.

on May 31, 2010

Ok, but stores still sell them and other religious items.

Those are copies. Moses got the original for free.

 

on May 31, 2010

Those are copies. Moses got the original for free.

LOL

 

 

on May 31, 2010

I myself got a Christian Bible in Hebrew (!) on the train to Haifa last year.

Just because you didn't buy it doesn't mean no one did. Someone had to.

on Jun 02, 2010

Just because you didn't buy it doesn't mean no one did. Someone had to.

well paper, ink and materials are costly not to mention the labor involved.  So do you think Walmart should just give out free bibles? 

There are plenty of groups that do like the Gideons at no cost to others and almost any strong Christian will spend his own money to buy another a bible (I've done so countless times) but because it's the #1 best seller of all times there is quite a market out there as well. 

 

on Jun 02, 2010

So do you think Walmart should just give out free bibles?

Yes. Should you have to pay for salvation?

on Jun 02, 2010

Yes. Should you have to pay for salvation?

While I agree with you (is this a first?) that it would be nice to have Walmart give out free bibles it has nothing to do with salvation. 

Salvation is indeed free.  Going out to buy a bible doesn't make one saved.  Usually when one buys a bible it's after they are saved.  I have probably at least 20 diff bibles in my house.  All for diff reasons.  Some have big print.  Some are small and handy to put in a purse.  Some have good commentary.  Some are just to compare the translations from the original wording etc. 

You can go to any church (that is worth its salt) and get a free bible.  You don't have to go to Walmart. 

 

on Jun 02, 2010

You can go to any church (that is worth its salt) and get a free bible. You don't have to go to Walmart.

The church bought them.

on Jun 03, 2010

The church bought them.

True, only because to buy a printing press would cost too much money.  Otherwise they could print their own, but they would still have to buy the paper, ink and other materials now wouldn't they?

In the old days (before the printing press) scribes copied each and every word onto parchment paper and scrolls but they still had to come up with the paper didn't they? 

You could always go to the church, borrow a bible, copy down all 66 books and then return the bible and then you'd have God's word for free.  Of course you'd still have to supply the pen and paper.  So which is easier?

 

on Jul 26, 2010

Are you one of those people that still believe men and women have a different amount of ribs?

on Jul 27, 2010

no, never heard of such a thing! 

14 PagesFirst 10 11 12 13 14