lula posts:

leauki posts:

Of course you do...read your own statement....

Your own statement of belief you descended from ape-like creatures proves you have undenial faith in evolution.

lula posts:

leauki posts:

Knock, knock....time to face reality, Leaki....admit it or not, believe it or not .....Evolution according to the textbook, web and dictionary definition is a make-believe story, being masqueraded as scientific theory and indoctrinated to unwary school children as fact.  

We are standing before a very thick brick wall of willful ignorance, Leauki.  Because faith apparently requires it.  Up is down, black is white.  C'est la vie.

I've seen some evidence that we were descended from apes: George W. Bush wiped bird crap off of his sleeve with his bare hand. All you have to do is look at the behavior of people sometimes and you'll start to see it.

What can be said about someone who believes that the illogical is logical?

No, I believe that because of the evidence I have seen.

I believe in G-d because of faith but I believe that (other) apes and we descend from the same animals because we look similar.

Do you have any evidence for that claim?

Start with learning enough about evolution to be able to differentiate it from this Creationist construction where species "turn into" other species and animals appear out of thin air.

I recommend you read Richard Dawkins' books.

But your current ignorance is a disgrace.

You don't even know what evolution is yet you feel competent to judge it? What an arrogance!

Bird crap is easier to clean off hands (requires just water) than off certain fabrics.

Faith doesn't require ignorance.

I totally believe in studying and I believe that it is a duty for every Jew to learn as much about the world as possible.

I wasn't the best student in high school, but I at least understood what a scientific theory is and why it is never proven and why it is valuable to teach it even after it has been disproven. (Shouldt we teach children nothing about why we think rocks fall towards the ground just because all theories that explain it have been disproven?) In contrast to other theories, we have not yet found evidence that evolution is wrong. We found plenty of evidence that it is true. But even if we hadn't found any evidence that it is true, it would still be a valid theory until disproven.

Religion is a smart man’s admission that he cannot know everything. Religious fundamentalism is a stupid man’s admission that he thinks he knows enough. -- Moshe Wilkinson

I don't know how willful it really is.

I really think she honestly doesn't understand how science works.

Many people don't, but few are so vocal about wanting to put science right.

It's a general problem when people get their knowledge from dictionaries.

I think you misunderstood what I was saying. I don't see evolution as tautological at all, but I was resonding directly to the Ann Coulter quote, and was thus using her view on evolution. The 1100 years would be to use a base stock of one species and perform a long term experiment that separates the inital population into two distinctly different contained, self-sustaining environments. Ideally over that short a period, one would use a species with a rapid breeding cycle, but one with a 5 year birth to breeding age cycle would still provide at least 220 generations, which in theory would be enough to have enough genetic mutations to distinguish the two populations as different species.

What Evolution is..is clearly defined in dictionaries, on the Internet and in biology textbooks.  And you claiming yourself as a descendant of ape-like creatures proves you believe this definition of evolution as true. Now, this claim of yours must be believed by faith because evolutionists have offered not one scintilla of factual evidence that you descended from apes.

On Evolutionist's word, you believe Evolution by faith.

Doombringer90

There is no evidence for Evolution here in this scenario.

Race formation is very well documented. All it requires is isolation of a part of a population. After a few generations, the isolated population will lose some of its genes and thus, as long as the isolation continues, it will be different in some features from the original population from which it was isolated.

This is merely a reduction in the gene pool and that does not get evolution. Evolution  means construction of new genes. It means an increase in the amount of genetic information not a reduction of it. Evolution means the emergence of a new species. Evolution means making new things, not more differences of what already exists.  Start with ape-kind, you'll end with ape-kind. human-kind....you will end with human-kind. Start with fruit flies...you will end with fruit flies.

You all think that a 150 year old make-believe story called evolution is science. I don't. I think evolution is a lie being masqueraded as science.  

All theories that purport to be scientific must be compared and tested with observations and experiments. That's been done over and over with ET and no true evidence has been found to support evolutionary theory. Rather, evidence from science itself, particularly in the molecular and genetic fields, conflicts with or contradicts ET. It's time for scientists to abandon ET.  

lula appears to agree with you:

lula, do you know why human babies grab onto a person's long hair? Because that's how baby apes hang onto their mothers.

Thanks for proving that Evolution isn't even compatible with common sense.

leauki posts:

I judge, in fact, I condemn the big lie of evolution that over mythical millions of years man-kind evolved from slime through ape-like creatures to what he is today.  

What is the plenty of evidence that ape-evolved to-man evolution is true?  

I think we can safely say 'willful' now.